Speech is irrelevant, as well as Contradicting.

What is speech but an endless ramble of worlds that are, needless to say, pointless except for the beggining and ending statements. After they are stated there is no need for anything in the middle but to give reasoning to your statement. The reasoning of statements is always false information. Someone could easily just ramble on about the subject by giiving examples of something quite irelevant to the subject, but by connecting it with something equally irrevelant, the comparison might surprisingly appear accurate.
The middle of a speech is always just a bunch of words entangled together that can only make sense throgh the first and last statement of the speech. If the two last statement most of all is good, then the speech will apparently seem well done and professional. Whats in the middle does not matter unless something that is very noticiable, completely shocking, or enormously outrageous is said. Politicians do this all the time by putting out their statements, using an example of their statement, then go further by talking about there example till all thats left, is an endless chain of sub examples and irrelevant stories till, near the end of the speech,they make something up to connect the first statement to the last statement.
Therefore, speech is a false way to get ones point across, rather, all words must thenn eb irrevant in order to get ones point across. Action is the affirmative way. However ivalid some points to this sort of perception is as it is much of a rant as it is a contradiction to the topic, there are in most ways, valid information which proves that what is said is correct.
Lastly,
I love Contradictions!!